The reproducibility of measuring maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter from ultrasound images

Journal Publication ResearchOnline@JCU
Matthews, Evan O.;Pinchbeck, Jenna;Elmore, Kylie;Jones, Rhondda;Moxon, Joseph V.;Golledge, Jonathan
Abstract

Background: Accurate repeat assessment of the diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is important. This study investigated the reproducibility of different methods of measuring AAA diameter from ultrasound images. Methods: Fifty AAA patients were assessed by ultrasound. Maximum AAA diameter was measured independently by three trained observers on two separate occasions using a standardised protocol. Five diameters were measured from each scan, three in the anterior-posterior (AP) and two in the transverse (TV) plane, including inner-to-inner (ITI), outer-to-outer (OTO) and leading edge-to-leading edge (LETLE). Intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were reported as reproducibility coefficients. Statistical comparison of methods was performed using linear mixed effects models. Results: Intra-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 2.2 mm; AP ITI 2.4 mm; AP OTO 2.6 mm) were smaller than inter-observer reproducibility coefficients (AP LETLE 4.6 mm: AP ITI 4.5; and AP OTO 4.8 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in intra-observer reproducibility of three types of measurements performed in the AP plane. Measurements obtained in the TV plane had statistically significant worse intra-observer reproducibility than those performed in the AP plane. Conclusions: This study suggests that the comparison of maximum AAA diameter between repeat images is most reproducibly performed by a single trained observer measuring diameters in the AP plane.

Journal

The Ultrasound Journal

Publication Name

N/A

Volume

13

ISBN/ISSN

2524-8987

Edition

N/A

Issue

N/A

Pages Count

6

Location

N/A

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publisher Url

N/A

Publisher Location

N/A

Publish Date

N/A

Url

N/A

Date

N/A

EISSN

N/A

DOI

10.1186/s13089-021-00211-z