Determination of ferrous iron in biotite by EPMA using the flank method: development of a mineral-specific calibration
Journal Publication ResearchOnline@JCUThe oxidation state of iron in biotite provides key information on redox conditions, magma evolution, and fluid–rock interactions in igneous, metamorphic, and hydrothermal systems, yet routine determination of Fe2+ and Fe3+ by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) remains difficult. This study presents a biotite-specific calibration of the flank method for estimating Fe2+ from Fe Lβ/Lα intensity ratios. Rather than defining flank positions from garnet end-members, as in the conventional approach, flank positions were established directly from biotite spectra, exploiting the comparatively narrow Fe3+/ΣFe range of biotite to achieve more consistent spectral behaviour. Twelve biotite samples spanning a wide range of total iron content (8.29–22.61 wt% ΣFeO) were analysed by EPMA and independently characterised by wet chemistry to calibrate and test the method. A simple linear regression of Fe2+ against Lβ/Lα produced a strong correlation with wet-chemistry values (R2 = 0.95, average error 0.47 wt%), and incorporating total iron (ΣFe) into a multiple regression model improved the prediction of Fe2+/ΣFe, accounting for matrix-dependent effects associated with total Fe concentration. Leave-one-out cross-validation was applied to evaluate the performance of both models, and independent validation against a well-characterised reference biotite (LP-6) yielded Fe2+ estimates within 0.4–0.6 wt% of the reported composition. These results demonstrate that mineral-specific calibration of the flank method, combined with controlled instrumental conditions, offers a practical, and in-situ alternative to Mossbauer spectroscopy or synchrotron XANES for constraining Fe2+/Fe3+ in biotite, with potential application to other Fe-bearing silicates and to broader petrogenetic, ore-deposit, and metamorphic studies in which iron oxidation state provides information on mineral-forming conditions.
Chemical Geology
Chemical Geology
726
1872-6836
N/A
N/A
18
N/A
Elsevier
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10.1016/j.chemgeo.2026.123737
