Global trends and biases in biodiversity conservation research

Journal Publication ResearchOnline@JCU
Caldwell, Iain R.;Hobbs, Jean-Paul A.;Bowen, Brian W.;Cowman, Peter F.;Dibattista, Joseph D.;Whitney, Jon L.;Ahti, Pauliina A.;Belderok, Roy;Canfield, Sean;Coleman, Richard R.;Iacchei, Matthew;Johnston, Erika C.;Knapp, Ingrid;Nalley, Eileen M.;Staeudle, Timo M.;Láruson, Áki Jarl
Abstract

Efforts to conserve biodiversity have been hampered by long-standing biases, including a disproportionate focus on particular taxa and ecosystems with minimal attention to underlying genetic diversity. We assessed whether these biases have persisted over the past four decades by analyzing trends in 17,502 research articles published in four top conservation-focused journals. Overall, we found that historical biases in conservation biology research remain entrenched. Despite increasing numbers of conservation articles published each decade from 1980 to 2020, research effort has increasingly focused on the same suite of taxa. Surprisingly, some of the most-studied species in these conservation articles had low conservation risk, including several domesticated animals. Animals and terrestrial ecosystems are consistently over-represented while plants, fungi, and freshwater ecosystems remain under-represented. Strategically funding investigations of understudied species and ecosystems will ensure more effective conservation effort across multiple levels of biodiversity, alleviate impediments to biodiversity targets, and ultimately prevent further extinctions.

Journal

Cell Reports Sustainability

Publication Name

Cell Reports Sustainability

Volume

1

ISBN/ISSN

2949-7906

Edition

N/A

Issue

N/A

Pages Count

11

Location

N/A

Publisher

Cell Press

Publisher Url

N/A

Publisher Location

N/A

Publish Date

N/A

Url

N/A

Date

N/A

EISSN

N/A

DOI

10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100082