Comparing non-sterile with sterile gloves for minor surgery: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Journal Publication ResearchOnline@JCUAbstract
Objective: To compare the incidence of infection after minor surgery conducted using non-sterile clean boxed gloves with surgery conducted using sterile gloves. Design: Prospective randomised controlled single-centre trial testing for non-inferiority in infection rates. Setting: Primary care regional centre, Queensland, Australia. Participants: Consecutive patients presenting to participating general practitioners for a minor skin excision, between 30 June 2012 and 28 March 2013, were eligible to participate. Intervention: The use of non-sterile clean boxed gloves was compared with normal treatment using sterile gloves in the control group. Main outcome measures: Wound infection, assessed at the time of removal of sutures, and other adverse events. Results: Four hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients presenting for minor skin excisions were randomly allocated to the two treatment groups: non-sterile clean boxed gloves (n = 250) or sterile gloves (n = 243). Four hundred and seventy-eight patients contributed data for analysis (241 non-sterile, 237 sterile gloves). The incidence of infection in the non-sterile gloves group (8.7%; 95% CI, 4.9%–12.6%) was significantly non-inferior compared with the incidence in the control group (9.3%; 95% CI, 7.4%–11.1%). The two-sided 95% CI for the difference in infection rate (− 0.6%) was − 4.0% to 2.9%, and did not reach the predetermined margin of 7% which had been assumed as the non-inferiority limit. Results of the intention-to-treat analysis were confirmed by per-protocol and sensitivity analyses. There were no important adverse effects. Conclusion: Our study suggests that in regard to wound infection, non-sterile clean boxed gloves are not inferior to sterile gloves for minor skin excisions in general practice.
Journal
Medical Journal of Australia
Publication Name
N/A
Volume
202
ISBN/ISSN
1326-5377
Edition
N/A
Issue
1
Pages Count
6
Location
N/A
Publisher
Australasian Medical Publishing Company
Publisher Url
N/A
Publisher Location
N/A
Publish Date
N/A
Url
N/A
Date
N/A
EISSN
N/A
DOI
10.5694/mja14.00314