Beyond a 'good thing': political interests and the meaning of landcare

Other Publication ResearchOnline@JCU
Lockie, Stewart
Abstract

[Extract] If any one question plagues those who seek to evaluate or comment on Landcare - not to mention those attempting to initiate Landcare groups or programs - it is the seemingly innocuous question of just what Landcare is. Even the most cursory perusal of documentation on Landcare will reveal at least two things; firstly, that the term 'Landcare' means many things to many people; and secondly, that the idea of Landcare is closely related to many other concepts and projects. If we look solely at this book, for instance, we find that Landcare is examined as a government program by Curtis and De Lacy; a form of extension and information system by Carr; a means of enacting governance by Martin; and as the network of community Landcare groups, and supporting institutions, by Campbell. Further, the chapter by Ritchie shows that the concept of Landcare has travelled across the Tasman, but has changed even further along the way. The question we might ask is whether the dilemmas this diversity poses for professional evaluators - who work best with clear goals and criteria -are of any consequence for anybody else.

Journal

N/A

Publication Name

Critical Landcare

Volume

N/A

ISBN/ISSN

978-1-875781-40-9

Edition

N/A

Issue

5

Pages Count

14

Location

N/A

Publisher

Charles Sturt University

Publisher Url

N/A

Publisher Location

Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia

Publish Date

N/A

Url

N/A

Date

N/A

EISSN

N/A

DOI

N/A