Beyond a 'good thing': political interests and the meaning of landcare
Other Publication ResearchOnline@JCUAbstract
[Extract] If any one question plagues those who seek to evaluate or comment on Landcare - not to mention those attempting to initiate Landcare groups or programs - it is the seemingly innocuous question of just what Landcare is. Even the most cursory perusal of documentation on Landcare will reveal at least two things; firstly, that the term 'Landcare' means many things to many people; and secondly, that the idea of Landcare is closely related to many other concepts and projects. If we look solely at this book, for instance, we find that Landcare is examined as a government program by Curtis and De Lacy; a form of extension and information system by Carr; a means of enacting governance by Martin; and as the network of community Landcare groups, and supporting institutions, by Campbell. Further, the chapter by Ritchie shows that the concept of Landcare has travelled across the Tasman, but has changed even further along the way. The question we might ask is whether the dilemmas this diversity poses for professional evaluators - who work best with clear goals and criteria -are of any consequence for anybody else.
Journal
N/A
Publication Name
Critical Landcare
Volume
N/A
ISBN/ISSN
978-1-875781-40-9
Edition
N/A
Issue
5
Pages Count
14
Location
N/A
Publisher
Charles Sturt University
Publisher Url
N/A
Publisher Location
Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
Publish Date
N/A
Url
N/A
Date
N/A
EISSN
N/A
DOI
N/A