Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas

Fernandes, Leanne;Day, Jon;Lewis, Adam;Slegers, Suzanne;Kerrigan, Brigid;Breen, Dan;Cameron, Darren;Jago, Belinda;Hall, James;Lowe, Dave;Innes, James;Tanzer, John;Chadwick, Virginia;Thompson, Leanne;Gorman, Kerrie;Simmons, Mark;Barnett, Bryony;Sampson, Kirsti;De'ath, Glenn;Mapstone, Bruce;Marsh, Helene;Possingham, Hugh;Ball, Ian;Ward, Trevor;Dobbs, Kirstin;Aumend, James;Slater, Deb;Stapleton, Kate

Helene Marsh

Abstract

The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park, an area almost the size of Japan, has a new network of no-take areas that significantly improves the protection of biodiversity. The new marine park zoning implements, in a quantitative manner, many of the theoretical design principles discussed in the literature. For example, the new network of no-take areas has at least 20% protection per “bioregion,” minimum levels of protection for all known habitats and special or unique features, and minimum sizes for no-take areas of at least 10 or 20 km across at the smallest diameter. Overall, more than 33% of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park is now in no-take areas (previously 4.5%). The steps taken leading to this outcome were to clarify to the interested public why the existing level of protection was inadequate; detail the conservation objectives of establishing new no-take areas; work with relevant and independent experts to define, and contribute to, the best scientific process to deliver on the objectives; describe the biodiversity (e.g., map bioregions); define operational principles needed to achieve the objectives; invite community input on all of the above; gather and layer the data gathered in round-table discussions; report the degree of achievement of principles for various options of no-take areas; and determine how to address negative impacts. Some of the key success factors in this case have global relevance and include focusing initial communication on the problem to be addressed; applying the precautionary principle; using independent experts; facilitating input to decision making; conducting extensive and participatory consultation; having an existing marine park that encompassed much of the ecosystem; having legislative power under federal law; developing high-level support; ensuring agency priority and ownership; and being able to address the issue of displaced fishers.

Journal

Conservation Biology

Publication Name

N/A

Volume

ISBN/ISSN

1523-1739

Edition

N/A

Issue

Pages Count

Location

N/A

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Publisher Url

N/A

Publisher Location

Malden, USA -MA

Publish Date

N/A

Url

N/A

Date

N/A

EISSN

N/A

DOI

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00302.x